Program

Schedule

09h00: Welcome

09h15: Keynote: How Do We Move Practical Fault Tolerance Out of the 1990s? (Jay Lofstead, Sandia National Laboratories, USA)

10h30: Coffee Break

11h00: A Failure Prediction-based Adaptive Checkpointing Method with Less Reliance on Temperature Monitoring for HPC Applications (Muhammad Alfian Amrizal, Pei Li, Mulya Agung, Ryusuke Egawa and Hiroyuki Takizawa)

11h35: Challenges in Developing MPI Fault-Tolerant Fortran Applications (Nathan Weeks, Glenn Luecke, Pieter Maris and James Vary)

12h10: Closing

12h15: End

Keynote details

With storage innovations delivering near memory performance and a continued requirement that new leadership platforms achieve a 90% forward progress per hour metric, checkpoint/restart has become the tried and true standard for achieving fault tolerance. While tons of innovative work has demonstrated interesting and different approaches that can reduce the time to save data, none have gained traction in production codes. Since checkpoint data is still used for analysis, is it even possible to move away from this technique to something “better”?

Paper details

A Failure Prediction-based Adaptive Checkpointing Method with Less Reliance on Temperature Monitoring for HPC Applications

Checkpointing with a constant checkpoint interval is optimal assuming an exponential distribution of failures. However, in practice there are many events that correlate with failures, such as CPU temperature. Under these circumstances, adaptive checkpoint intervals are more appropiate, but require extra overhead to monitor the system. In this paper, we propose an adaptive checkpointing method that avoids constant monitoring by using timings of the already occurred failures, called the prior failures, to estimate the mean time to failure (MTTF) of the next failure, called the posterior failure. The simulation results show that the proposed method can reduce the total wasted time compared to the constant checkpointing method with a considerably small temperature monitoring period.

Challenges in Developing MPI Fault-Tolerant Fortran Applications

Powerful high performance computing systems of the future are expected to have higher failure rates than current systems. The MPI 3.1 standard does not address the issue of MPI process failures. Checkpoint/restart is commonly used to add fault tolerance to MPI applications, however this can have a high overhead. Several MPI fault tolerance libraries, such as ULFM, are being developed to enable MPI programs to recover from MPI process failures. This can circumvent much of the overhead of an application restart, including rescheduling, launching, initializing, and reading checkpoint data. Each library uses a different approach to recovery from MPI process failures. Unfortunately, some of the proposed recovery models are incompatible with Fortran. This paper intends to help Fortran MPI application developers avoid problems when developing fault-tolerant MPI applications.